[Civil Appeal No.... 6794.... of 2013 arising out of SLP (C) No. 14896 of 2013]. In the judgment under appeal, the High Court of Chhattisgarh framed the following question for adjudication, namely:- "Whether Pandit Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur (the University) is liable to issue mark sheet to the students, who are permitted to appear in the examination for improving division of M.Com examination (the subsequent-examination) under Ordinance 24 of the University (the Ordinance), even if the division does not change?" The High Court answered the question in the affirmative. We disagree. Ordinance No.24 of the University does not oblige it to issue afresh mark sheet to a student who does not improve his division on taking a subsequent examination held for improving the division. The respondent Shri Gopal Mishra completed his two year Master of Commerce course with an aggregate of 49.54% marks. This placed him in the second division as per Ordinance No. 24 of the University which relates to the Master of Commerce examination.
↧