[Arbitration Petition No. 20 of 2011]. An application under Section 11(4) read with Section 11(10) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, hereinafter referred to as "the1996 Act", has given rise to an important question of law relating to the scope and ambit of the powers of the Chief Justice under Section 11(6) of the said Act. In view of the importance of the question, which has arisen, the matter which was being heard by the delegate of the Chief Justice, has been referred to a larger Bench for determination thereof. M/s. Antrix Corporation Limited, the Petitioner herein, a Government Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and engaged in the marketing and sale of products and services of the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO), entered into an Agreement with the Respondent, Devas Multimedia P. Ltd., hereinafter referred to as "Devas" on 28th January, 2005, for the lease of Space Segment Capacity on ISRO/ Antrix S-Band Spacecraft. Article 19 of the Agreement empowered the Petitioner to terminate the Agreement in certain contingencies. It also provided that the Agreement and the rights and responsibilities of the parties there under would be subject to and construed in accordance with the laws of India. In other words, the domestic law would be the governing law of the Agreement.
↧