Quantcast
Channel: Latest Supreme Court Judgments - AdvocateKhoj
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13880

Kali Aerated Water Works, Salem Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai [13/05/15]

$
0
0
[Civil Appeal No. 3594 of 2005]. [Civil Appeal No. 3611 and 4387-4392 of 2005]. It is not in dispute that the appellant herein is a Small Scale Industrial Unit (hereinafter referred to SSI Unit) and is manufacturing Aerated Water under various brand names using the trade mark with the "Kalimark" / M/s.Kali Aerated Water Works" It sought exemption from payment of excise duty in terms of Notification 1/93-CE dated 28.2.1993 (as amended vide Notification No.59/94-CE dated 1.3.1994) for the aforesaid goods manufactured in its factory. This has, however, been denied to the assessee by the Department on the ground that the brand name "Kalimark" has been used on the goods which belong to M/s. Shri K.P.R.Shakthivel and since the assessee is using the aforesaid brand name of the third party, by virtue of para 4 of the aforesaid Notification the exemption would not be allowed to the respondent. This stand taken by the respondent department has been accepted by the CESTAT in its impugned judgment. The Tribunal has noted the fact that business of manufacture and sale of Aerated water was started in the name of 'Kalimark Aerated Water Works' by the HUF of which M/s. Shri P.V.S. K.Palaniappa Nadar was the Karta. Later on it was converted into a joint family business of Sh. Palaniappa Nadar and his three sons and a daughter.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13880

Trending Articles