Quantcast
Channel: Latest Supreme Court Judgments - AdvocateKhoj
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13880

Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai Vs. M/s. Australian Foods India Pvt. Ltd. [14/01/13]

$
0
0
[Civil Appeal No. 2826 of 2006]. The short question of law which arises for consideration in this appeal is, whether the manufacture and sale of specified goods that do not physically bear a brand name, from branded sale outlets, would disentitle an assessee from the benefit of S.S.I. Notification No. 1/93-C.E., dated 28th February, 1993, as amended from time to time. Briefly stated, the material facts giving rise to the appeal, are as follows: Pursuant to an inspection by the officials of the enforcement Commissionerate, Chennai-II at the sales outlet of the respondent(hereinafter referred as "the assessee"), revealed that the assessee was engaged in the manufacture and sale of cookies from branded retail outlets of "Cookie Man". The assessee had acquired this brand name from M/s Cookie Man Pvt. Ltd, Australia (which in turn acquired it from M/s Auto- bake Pvt. Ltd., Australia). The brand name used the words "Cookie Man" accompanied with a logo depicting the smiling face of a mustachioed chef. The assessee was selling some of these cookies in plastic pouches/containers on which the brand name described above was printed. No brand name was affixed or inscribed on the cookies. Excise duty was duly paid, on the cookies sold in the said pouches/containers. However, on the cookies sold loosely from the counter of the same retail outlet, with plain plates and tissue paper, duty was not paid.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13880

Trending Articles